Friday, 19 July 2013

Living with dinosaurs


It is now the time when city councils pledge all over again in local newspapers to do something about urban gulls, screaming things like "IT'S WAR!" on the front pages. Various idiotic schemes are experimented with, and the latest in this town is the application of a gel applied to roofs and parapets which is supposed to make the gull think that the building is on fire, and not to want to nest on it. Yeah right.

For the last few years, they have brought in a falconer who stands on one of about two roofs at a time, letting his huge and cumbersome Harris Hawk fly about upsetting the gull population, which just flies about making 10 times more noise than usual and then settles back onto the building when Harry the Hawk has gone home.

Over the last 23 years, I have become a bit of an expert on gulls, and I can honestly say that I understand almost every aspect of their body language when communicating with each other, having watched pair after pair perform each day outside our compact but adorable city apartment over that time.

This year, after about 3 weeks of noisy territorial stand-offs, one pair chose a nesting place in full view from our kitchen, and for the last couple of weeks have been sitting on a couple of eggs in the pile of rubbish they call 'a nest'.

The day before yesterday, the eggs hatched and the chicks doubled in size in a matter of 24 hours.

I got home last night to find H.I. standing at the window, saying that she was worried about the chicks, as they hadn't moved for several hours. She was quite right to be worried - the chicks had wandered about six feet from the nest into the fierce heat of the sun, and had both died on the spot.

By way of consolation, I said that gulls did not have the same reactions to the death of their children as us humans, but I had not witnessed an event like this at such close quarters before, so what did I know?

As the sun went down, the female parent (larger than the male) displayed all of the emotions that most humans do in this situation, apart from hysterically rending her garments in grief.

The first reaction is something like, "Shit. What do we do now?" Their bodies are hormonally set to take care of the fluffy things as they grow larger each day, but it begins to sink in that these particular chicks are not going to do that.

There then follows a period of obvious mourning when the female wanders slowly around the dead chicks, actually bowing her head in the same way that guards of honour do at state funerals. Then she lies quietly next to them and adopts a posture of sleep, though sleep seems to evade her. I looked out of the window after dark and before going to bed, and I could make her out - a white shape keeping vigil over the two corpses.

This morning at about 7.30, she was still there, trying to find solace in sleep. The male would come back every so often as he would have done anyway to relieve his wife (gulls pair for life and can live up to 40 years) while she went off for refreshments, and he would wander about the chicks just to make sure they were still dead.

Just as I began to write this, I looked out of the window to see her having a little taste of one of her chicks - she must be getting a bit hungry by now.

The short period of mourning must be over now, but I think it must have been long enough for the chicks to dessicate too much to be easily edible - they are so small and the weather is so hot.

Waste not, want not, eh? I think they will be back on the nest shortly with fresh eggs, but I don't know if they have learnt a lesson in parenthood by leaving their offspring unattended for so long in the first 24 hours of life on earth. A cat would have picked up the kittens and taken them back to the shelter, but then again, cats do not - traditionally - nest on cliffs.



22 comments:

  1. Technical note: Remember me saying that my camera was buggering-up the entire computer by slowing everything down when downloading pictures? Well I went to a camera shop yesterday to buy a new SD card, and the helpful bloke suggested I should re-format the existing one, because all cards retain tons of information even after being wiped clean of images, etc. I did, and it worked. You live and learn.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How do you 're-format' an SD card?

      Delete
    2. Go into the menu of your camera and follow instructions. Make sure you have copied everything you want to keep, then obliterate all, not only on the SD card, but also the camera's internal memory.

      Delete
    3. By 'obliterate all' I mean hit the 'format' option, as you would do when installing a new SD card. It works a treat.

      Delete
  2. I think I'll go stick my head in the oven. :-/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You don't need to. The temperature here today hit about 32.

      Delete
  3. Remind me why peregrine falcons can't send the gull population packing. The falcons were introduced years ago to Cleveland and Akron, and no more pigeons. They are so popular we have falcon-cams watching over their nesting and the chicks. It's like, to possibly quote you, "a big bloody entertainment."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Our feral pigeons are scared of everything except their most dangerous predators - Peregrin Falcons. I don't know why.

      Delete
    2. Oh, I would never say "a big bloody entertainment". Dick Van Dyke might have, but not me.

      Delete
  4. Gulls are OK, there are simply too many of them. Maybe like with the squirrels, when you could get a shilling a tail, they should loan air guns to small boys and offer 50p per pair of beaks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Believe it or not, the Black Back gulls are getting scarce on the coast. Maybe there should be some enforced extradition.

      Delete
  5. I always " recycle " dead hen chicks... Although only 50% of the hens will get stuck in and eat them....
    However that cannibal half will enjoy the dead like caviar

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you kept snakes, it would be natural - ish.

      Delete
  6. First: I think of course animals (and I will even add plants, you can call me excentric) do have feelings. Those may not be interpreted or similar to ours - but feelings there are.
    Second: I met a young falconer in London - with his bird of prey, which killed doves - and talked with him, and got the impression that he was somehow ashamed of his job - maybe people normally are angry at him?
    Third: Is the idea to substitute the eggas - as they do with doves - by porcelain imitations - not good? They also feed the pigeons 'the pill'. Their population in cities is not 'normal' because they have no foes. Same with the seagulls.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gull's foes are humans, but humans are not very good at being foes with anything other than humans. We do sometimes cover the eggs in oil, which kills the contents but stops the gulls from having a second brood. On St Kilda, they used to eat the eggs.

      Everything has feelings, even rocks - we thought them all into existence, after all.

      Delete
  7. My God! I felt so sorry for the gull until she had a snack-attack.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I still felt sorry for her - even after the little bit of pragmatism.

      Delete
  8. Was your intention to make me feel so sad on a Friday night Tom? Well like Iris above I also felt sad until I got to the cannibal bit and then my sadness dissipated a bit. They really are a bit of a pest though aren't they? When I was a kid we only saw gulls inland when it was stormy at sea (or so we always said) - now they are everywhere and nest round here quite happily, and for all I know eat their young as a tasty snack.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My father also said the same rubbish about inland gulls being blown in by strong winds - more romantic nonsense. They are only here for the food source, and now open rubbish tips are gone, it is bagged rubbish and discarded take-aways, if you discount dead chicks.

      Delete
  9. Mother Nature at work .... natural culling ..... all the same, not nice. XXXX

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 'Naughty but nice', to quote Salman Rushdie!

      Delete