Thursday 2 January 2014

Girl with a lap-dog


I like to think of this little porcelain figurine as Grayson Perry as a child but, in reality, I think it is of Queen Victoria, and made sometime toward the end of her lengthy reign. Not one of my better purchases of 2013.

She had been sitting on the same trader's stall for about 4 years, and had become grimy through handling, though none of the handlers liked her enough to buy her, including me.

When the trader became fed up with unpacking her, spending all Saturday looking at her, then packing her up again, he knocked her right down and I broke a golden rule by buying something I knew nothing about - not for the first time.

There is only one type of Staffordshire figure that I really love, and they are those wonderful little depictions of Greyhound Lurchers with stupid expressions on their faces. Some are just wonderful, and - coming from the era they do, when dogs of this type were unromantically looked upon as creatures of purpose, highly efficient killing-machines or racers - the expressions on their faces just sum up the irrepressible compulsion even hard-bitten humans have to anthropomorphise pet animals into adorable, special-needs creatures of almost the same species as us. Disney spoilt all that, and I can never forgive the corporation for it.

Now I remember, I have a good friend who has a different sort of Staffordshire figure which I really covet. It is of a fat ewe, quietly sitting down on a small tuft of vivid emerald grass and minding it's own, inconsequential business.

Because the features on all of these things were hastily painted with a sable brush by women of varying degrees of skill, and because it only takes a microscopic deviation in the tip of those brushes to turn an expression from regal to vacant to demonic, some of them live on as totally unique characters, their faces betraying their inner weaknesses long after their creators, their creators' children, grandchildren, etc. have died. They still raise affectionate smiles almost three hundred years later.

As someone who regularly struggles to hack just the right expression into the face of a half-ton block of stone, I very much understand the nuances which can be created or destroyed simply by using a nail-file on even something that big. It all comes together in the last five minutes.

That is the wonderful difference between art and artistry - when the professional gets it right, it often doesn't look anywhere near as right as when the amateur gets it wrong. This is why you never see a piece of bad art coming from the hand of a child. We have to be trained to make bad art, and it takes years of experience.

15 comments:

  1. Brighton Museum has a fantastic collection of very rare Staffordshire figures; they make most of the bog-standard dogs and flatbacks look very parochial. Worth a visit if you're ever there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This one's back is not flat, but she is not a Staffy either.

      Delete
  2. I do so agree with that last paragraph Tom - at school we somehow unlearn what good art is and substitute what we think people wish to see.
    I love those flatbacks of couples to stand either end of the mantelpiece - really covet some. I keep dropping hints to the farmer but they are not taken up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Flatbacks - sounds like the sort of neighbours we all dread to have.

      Delete
  3. It's not without charm. Be careful not to drop it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for that wonderful advice, Gwil. I will be sure to try to enjoy it for what it is (if I ever work that one out), at the same time as trying not to drop it like the complete fucking moron that I am.

      Delete
  4. So true Tom. I feel totally in awe of my son's drawings. I showed him how to make a round thing look so with shadow and with this tiny piece of information he produces magical images. Anyway, I think Grayson would be delighted with your comparison and I have a Staffordshire figure of two blokes leaning on a tree with what looks like a HUGE spaniel in between them and I absolutely adore it. Happy New Year....have I already said that?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Beware the imparting of technique, it can too easily turn into style - that's all I have to say, other than Happy New Year to you too.

      Delete
  5. I just LOVE those Staffordshire canines as well as all things Disney!
    Your doll is charming and I so agree about artistry. As a child I thought it all came out of Japan but now think the majority comes out of China.....or my house, ha! (I like to dabble)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Chinese porcelain came out of Britain, after a spy went over there about 300 years ago and brought the secret back to keep it as long as possible, which was not very long - long enough to make him a fortune, though. The secret was out when they called it 'bone china'. (I made all of this up).

      Delete
  6. Replies
    1. 🎶 Who will buy 🎶 ?!!!! …. Song from ' Oliver ' …. Mark Lester ? GEDDIT ? XXXX

      Delete
    2. Mark Lester? I'm going to have to look it up.

      Delete
    3. Ah, now I understand. A friend of mine's son now looks exactly like Mark Lester (born Letzer) did in 1977.

      GEDDIT? Not really, Jack@!

      Delete
  7. All these figurines (here in Berlin you see them from Meissen or KPM) are definitely not my cup of tea. I agree that schools often are spoiling childrens' fantasy and drawing skills - dicussed that with more than one teacher - but in Germany it might be tge fault of the school system: teachers for little children seldom learned how to teach art - not important enough in their eyes, I fear.

    ReplyDelete