Circumstances have - once again - caused me to sit back and reflect on what I get out of blogging and ask myself who, or what type of person I kid myself reads all this bollocks, other than the elderly and retired with too much time on their hands, or the unemployed/unemployable who are simply bored with daytime T.V. and website porn.
I was off onto what I thought was quite a nice roll, reflecting on the state of European cuisine, by reflecting on it's history as informed by my latest book - 'Seven Hundred Years of English Cooking' by Maxime McKendry. Then someone's dog had the insensitivity to die right in the middle of meal-time, and I had the insensitivity to call it a 'mutt', albeit it in private.
If I was a proper writer, there would be an agent or publisher to form a fire-break between me and my adoring public, who would prevent me from upsetting any of them with a thoughtless (or thoughtful) joke or throw-away comment made on the spur of the moment, and vice versa. I think I mentioned recently that I was so impressed and enamoured with a series of dark comedy radio drama (On Mardle Fen) that I looked up the author - Nick Warburton - on the net, and found someone who appeared to be a friend of his, who had a website devoted to growing potatoes...
Anyway, I wrote to the potato-grower and asked him to pass on my compliments to Nick regarding Mardle Fen then, a week or two later, I received an email from Nick himself, thanking me for my 'kind words'. We had a short conversation about various mutual interests - John Aubrey being one - and he alerted me to forthcoming radio dramas which featured his writing.
At the time I thought that this was a very brave thing for him to do, since he didn't know me at all and I could have been trying to get that £5000 back for a friend who lent it to him 15 years ago. Many beautiful actresses would not have done it, or - if they did - might have been forced to call the police and change their email addresses, knowing (or not knowing) me.
That's the good thing about writing or painting or sculpting - your face is not necessarily known, and your real name is not necessarily known either. Ironically, the owner of the dead dog is the only person to know my real name (besides Cro, but he doesn't count in this context), and the only person to have my day-to-day email address (also besides Cro, but he had plenty of opportunity to insult me 40 years ago), which he used to tell me that I am a 'twat'.
You get to feel like you are a part of a family in this blogging business, and the wider your readership appears to be, the bigger the family. I would imagine that if you were a best-selling author, you would sort of get to 'feel' how well you were going down with the readership, even if they had no direct way of telling you. Also, you would not run the risk of intruding into someone's personal grief because - as it says on the fly-leaf - 'any similarity to persons or situations in this book are entirely coincidental', or words to that effect. It needs a real psycho to take a work of fiction by a stranger as an observation on the secret personal details of a reader's life - or mind.
There is one sort of blog which I follow here in Google land which I will NOT read under any circumstances at all, and that is the ones that people write about writing. Any mention of any ambition to do with writing that is hung up like washing on a line, including technical details to do with editing, etc by a wannabe writer is enough to make me close the page and go to something I might find more interesting - a post on growing vegetables, for instance.
It's the same with 'book clubs'. Who wants to know what other people think about someone else's writing? It should stand up on it's own, even if it's only mentioned in passing - "Did you read that so-and-so's latest book? Good isn't it?" End of story.
Equally, I don't blog for therapy or because I am lonely. If something bad has happened in my life, I will only blog about it if I think it could be useful or just entertaining to others, and the only way it is going to be useful to them is if they have gone - or about to go - through the same experience themselves. I don't need the sympathy of strangers - in fact, I can't use the sympathy of strangers. I can use their jokes, though.
Anyway, this is beginning to sound like a rant, so I'm off to compose some more bollocks about food or candlesticks or something.
(The above photo was taken in a corridor of a Gay/Transvestite Bar I visited in Bremerhaven, btw)
I'm one of those newly retired with too much time on my hands who reads your ramblings and directed to your blog from another equally interesting blog.
ReplyDeleteIf one of my dogs died suddenly I would be most upset if my dog was called a "mutt" albeit in private.
Don't kid yourself that you're anonymous, you post enough information about your eBay purchases for anyone to trace your user name and real name.
The difference with you and the dog owner is that he doesn't hide behind anonymity. His life is an open book. I don't suppose he needs the sympathy of strangers as he is a very sociable guy anyway. I understand the pain he is going through being a mad, dog woman myself.
Crickey, perhaps I should give up blogging right now! And who the heck are you then?
ReplyDeleteThat sounds a bit threatening, Eileen. You've obviously thought about it. I didn't put this post up in order to attract attacks, but that's what I seem to have done. Of course anyone could find out who I really was - IF they were the slightest bit interested. One of the reasons for having a pseudonym is that it is supposed to become less personal, less taken to heart. Talking of hiding behind anonymity - is Eileen your real name? It might as well be, since we don't know your last one, and even if we did, what the hell would we do with it? Open a bank account?
ReplyDeleteI am neither bored, nor retired, but work full time and watch very little TV, preferring interesting blogs such as yours where there is humour, sarcasm and a general wealth of knowledge about subjects I would never know much about.
ReplyDeleteAnd I would hardly say you are striving to be that anonymous since you post photos of you and HI and her art show etc. I don't see you as a man hiding at all.
From the time I have read your blog, I feel that I have gotten to "know" you a little bit and would think that you calling the poor deceased Constance a mutt was merely to diffuse the sadness of J losing his precious dog and certainly not as an insult.
Oh dear....you seem to have opened up a bit of a can of worms here. I found you via Mise @ Pretty Far West and came over because I liked your sense of humour in the comments that you leave her. I don't care if you are called Tom, Farquhar, Charlie Farnsbarns or whatever....I fail to see that it matters really.
ReplyDeleteI know that it is 'par bon' to put exclamation marks after a sentence, as the sentence should speak for itself but, I use them all of the time along with haha, just in case anyone gets the wrong end of the stick when I leave a comment or write something that could be taken out of context.
Hope you and the owner of deceased dog work it out.
I don't know what you get out of blogging as the author of a blog, but I know what I get out of it as a reader. To (sort of) quote you: "Did you read that so-and-so's latest blog? Good isn't it?" End of story.
ReplyDeleteActually, you are right about me wanting to alleviate the depression of the doggie master - thanks for pointing that out,Raz and Jacqueline. I don't actually seek out every opportunity to be cruel or unkind to others, which I thought he would have worked out for himself. I would rather say nothing, which is what I did in the first place, before being told that I should have commented! (note the exclamation mark)
ReplyDeleteHow did you know my name was Charlie Farnsbarns, btw?
Aha! Finally you've outed yourself! 'Corridor of a gay / transvestite bar'...and your real name is Talula Redbottom. It all makes sense now.
ReplyDeleteShit, Tom, if I worried about offending people every time I left a comment I'd have (or someone else would have) set fire to this bloody computer months ago.
'On Mardle Fen' was a cracking radio play. I'm currently listening to Michael Jayston reading 'Rogue Male' by Geoffrey Household on BBC R4 Extra. It's made me buy the book...
Twat.
Oh and btw...
ReplyDeleteI've listed you as a 'versatile blogger' so please feel free to accept and copy/paste this logo onto your blog (or tell me to shove it up my arse.)
http://growfisheat.blogspot.com/2011/08/and-nominations-are.html
If you accept the idea is (I think) to continue the link...
All the best
Chris.
x
Tom, you do write a load of bollocks like you say (well to be fair - not all the time) but we love you anyway! I read your posts, every one of them, even when I don't comment. What do you want -blood?
ReplyDeleteJoe and I are reading your posts. Joe manages to keep up with you even if I lapse for a few posts. You do have some drama going on right now. Your blog with it's sort of flowing conversation in the comments reminds me of some of the social media sites like Facebook. I am not a fan of that site but I am a fan of this blog.
ReplyDeleteYes, Chris - I'm also on my 3rd listening to 'Rogue Male', by Mr Household (what a name), and the reader is absolutely perfect. What a fantastic production. Thanks also for the mention after your award - I don't normally respond to blogger awards, so please don't be disappointed if I don't again. Very pleased, all the same.
ReplyDeleteSome blood would be nice, thanks Moll.
Joe and Olive - I thought you said, 'not a fan of that shite' for a minute, I thought some North Eastern Englishness had rubbed off. Anyway, I'm glad you and Joe read it! (note the exclamation mark again - this is getting to be a bad habit!)
Let's leave the Internet drama at the door hey, it's never worth it and always turn out badly. The way to deal with someone taking offence at your insensitivity is rarely to write a blog post about it.
ReplyDeleteLet it go and write about candlesticks fr a while.
It would appear that once again you have inserted foot in mouth....the very fact that I recognize the condition indicates that I MAY have done so myself on occasion. Lay low, write about candletsticks and antique glassware for a week or two, you'll be all right.
ReplyDeleteSee that? This is precisely why I don't have a damn blog; too much work and angst. I follow who I enjoy and when they're not saying anything interesting...click...see ya tomorrow. Frankly, Charlie Farnsbarns, I like your blog and even find you interesting when you rant and carry on like a fussy little girl.
ReplyDeleteI'll write about whatever I damn well please, Dan.
ReplyDelete'Fussy little girl' is a first for me. I've called many things, but that one - never. I like it.